Disney Sends ByteDance an AI Trophy within the Type of a Stop and Desist Letter Over Seedance 2.0

When an organization releases a brand new AI mannequin, it’s develop into customary for it to make a splash by pissing off an mental property proprietor or another entity talking up on behalf of copyrights, ideally spurring some type of authorized motion or warning.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT has been the target of lawsuits galore—most famously from the New York Times. Stability was sued, largely unsuccessfully by a consortium of picture copyright holders within the UK. OpenAI received a note from Japan when Sora 2 was launched, asking it to chorus from what it considers the infringement of anime and manga copyrights. Suno and Udio were at one point targeted by music publishers over alleged copyright violations. There are numerous different examples, every with its personal allegations and accusations.

Now apparently it’s ByteDance’s flip. The splashiest new AI mannequin of the previous few weeks, in case you haven’t heard, is ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0, which is kind of like Sora 2, besides the slop movies it makes are rather less embarrassing to look at.

Seedance 2.0 seems to be fairly versatile, however viral early prompts recommend that customers particularly prefer it for its pretend adverts, incessantly starring somebody who seems to have the face of Bob Odenkirk for some purpose, and for what seem like little 15-second John Wick motion pictures, besides the prompter can insert seemingly anybody they need rather than John Wick, akin to (apparently) Harry Potter, or Thanos, or RoboCop.

As a non-expert and non-lawyer myself, that is simply what very a lot seems to be the case, and I’m not claiming with certainty that anybody is infringing on something.

However with that in thoughts, I’d like to increase my congratulations to TikTok’s unique dad or mum firm ByteDance on the event of its viral AI mannequin! The prize for this accomplishment is a high-profile cease-and-desist letter, on this case from Disney.

The letter, which was seen by Axios and reported on Friday afternoon, says Seedance 2.0 comes “with a pirated library of Disney’s copyrighted characters from Star Wars, Marvel, and different Disney franchises, as if Disney’s coveted mental property had been free public area clip artwork.” Characters named within the letter embrace Child Yoda, Peter Griffin, Spider-Man, and Darth Vader.

The letter on behalf of Disney, attributed to an out of doors lawyer named David Singer, claims “ByteDance is hijacking Disney’s characters by reproducing, distributing, and creating spinoff works that includes these characters. ByteDance’s digital smash-and-grab of Disney’s IP is willful, pervasive, and completely unacceptable.”

Disney, after all, entered right into a content material partnership about two months in the past with OpenAI, not ByteDance, which means Disney IP isn’t free public area clip artwork, however extremely prized and unique clip artwork. Underneath the phrases of the settlement, OpenAI has defined that Sora will be able to be used “to generate brief, user-prompted social movies that may be seen and shared by followers, drawing from a set of greater than 200 animated, masked and creature characters from Disney, Marvel, Pixar and Star Wars.”

In the mean time, judging from my very own exams, this partnership has not but been built-in into the Sora product, as a result of Disney characters gave the impression to be blocked by the app. OpenAI’s web page concerning the Disney deal says Disney implementation needs to be anticipated in early 2026.

Disney is way from alone in making a deal like this. Final yr, Universal Music Group, for example, settled a lawsuit against the AI music generator Udio, and created a music-generation partnership within the course of. A number of weeks later Warner Music Group did the same thing.  

However the message that may be gleaned from these cease-and-desists and lawsuits within the context of eventual offers with AI corporations seems to be that corporations don’t a lot disapprove of AI getting used at will by random web customers to generate content material involving their treasured mental property with out concern for inventive benefit. It might appear from their actions that the AI needs to be used at will by random web customers to generate content material involving its treasured mental property with out concern for inventive benefit solely so long as the copyright holders can get their beaks moist.

It’s not clear how legally appropriate the OpenAI-Disney deal could be with any hypothetical future partnership between Disney and ByteDance, but when contract regulation prevents such a factor, perhaps ByteDance must accept an settlement that makes Seedance 2.0 the unique slop video generator of Common-affiliated mental property akin to Minions and the Quick & Livid cinematic universe.